After a successful first blog, I was keen to start this week. We were given a choice this week between two options: Explore some unfamiliar technologies, or identify and discuss some successful industry competitors who use social technologies. Without trying to sound lazy, the first option sounded far more interesting, as it would give me a great opportunity to get some hands on experience with some tools that I've - until now - only heard about.
My two chosen technologies for this blogging activity are RSS and Twitter and a dabble in Wikis. These came to my mind because I've always been aware about them, but never gotten a grip on them. RSS has always seemed elusive as a functional tool, and twitter just seems downright confusing (especially considering it is paraded around as some kind of super simple social media platform), and finally, I was never really sure about how wikis worked. Thus, my goals for this blog are set.
RSS
I've known about RSS since I had really started to explore the internet but never really understood how it works, or how it was meant to be used. The extent of my knowledge was that it was a way of aggregating text based information. How was it read? How was it accessed? Who made RSS, and who owned it?
So my first port of call was a read through of the Wikipedia page about, which was actually quite informative.
RSS, or Really Simple Syndication (as I prefer over Rich Site Summary), is a concept that's been around since the mid 90's with the emergence of Web 2.0. There was an agreed view that with all the information being generated, people needed a faster, simpler way to view all their relevant interests - news, blogs, podcasts, videos etc. RSS originated as RDF, and was developed as an initiative by a few people from Netscape, and it seems that it has since been an idea that different organisations have picked up, improved, and put down.
As it was well put in the CommonCrafts video, it basically turned around the way that the internet was used. Instead of users going out to find new information from their preferred sources, this information was brought to the user automatically.
RSS works by taking an XML file out of a webpage, which contains the important, relevant content that the page displays. For example with my blog - it would take out the new posts as they're updated: the date, the author and the content of the post (with a little bit of additional meta data). As it uses the XML file format, it can be transferred over FTP or HTTP protocols, and the raw data can be read by people... but doesn't look very nice - and hence, readers were made which allowed users to categorize, organise and view their feeds. There were MANY Feed readers out there, and as the XML language is quite easy to work with it enabled users to create their own readers. Readers allowed people to have multiple streams going at once, one for work, another for blogs and one for news if they liked.
As my research progressed to find a reader that I could use, it was very clear from the first search that one of the most popular, and discontinued readers - was Google Reader. Launched a decade after RSS was developed, and closed on July 1st, 2013 - notably because of declining use. Google supported users by allowing them to export their data, but didn't provide any sources on where to go from there.
So I started searching around for other popular readers, with a few criteria - it was preferably desktop based, lightweight, and easy to use.
After a little while of searching, I decided I would use Feedly. Judging by it's references on many of the results when I googled "RSS readers", it seems to be one of the most popular. A browser based reader, users sign in using Google+, Facebook or a few other alternative means (but not email, interestingly) to keep a track of their subscriptions. There, users can search for sites to add to their to-read list, and divide them among categories. At first, I had a little trouble understanding how it worked but after about half an hour of playing around, I got the hang of it, and had a nice little setup with three categories - News, Gaming and Videos - all linked to the sources that I frequent. The display of them all was quite well done too, and I liked the options it provided, of title and short description only, to a larger and more detailed tiled waterfall format.
I should point out though that it did seem to have a little trouble reading straight from a URL sometimes, and the sources that were found via it's search feature were better displayed, but I have a feeling that this was due a built-in limitation, to encourage users to upgrade to a paid "pro" version, giving you a "Speed Boost", which searches for new articles from smaller sites, 30mins faster. It's a little annoying, considering that I'm interested in seeing the new content ASAP, but it makes sense in todays world of online-subscriptions and "utility" fees.
I will continue to use Feedly and RSS feeds during the course of this unit to give it a fair go, but from my intial usage, it seems easier to have my favourite pages bookmarked, to visit them individually, and scroll through them rather than it is to have a tool which takes time to setup, and time to update. While I can appreciate what article aggregators like RSS and Atom try to achieve, I feel that unless your reader is well setup, multi-platform, quick to use and universally supported, then ultimately it's more effort than it's worth.
Twitter
Now ranked in the top ten Alexa "Most visited websites", Twitter was born out of a creative group think going on 9 years ago. Best described as a "SMS service to the internet", Twitter is a microblogging site, which allows users to write short, 140 character messages which are displayed on their pages. Users have handles so they can be contacted or tagged, and hash-tags are used as a means of grouping relevant subjects together.
I was interested when Twitter first came out, and many of my friends started signing up, but I've never really been attracted to it. Of all social media platforms, twitter seems to be one of the most "egotistical" of them all. Outside of my own bubble, 140 characters doesn't seem like enough to spur on any kind of meaningful conversation; and making an opinion with such a small character count means that you could be easily taken out of context - as many people have. Apart from personal-centric use of Twitter, I can see it as a useful way of sharing news and information in a blink, by linking to important, more detailed articles, or being able to provide short, rapid updates of things - like road works / traffic updates, election stats, and play-by-plays at sporting events.
My biggest problem with Twitter has been it's interface. I made a conscious effort a few years ago to sign up so I was able to receive updates about my favourite YouTubers, but didn't stick with it because I found the layout so convoluted - I didn't like how limited you were in seeing people tweets, and the fact that it didn't show what people were replying to, and how it prioritized what they were tagged in, over what they had said. So I took some time this week and tried to familiarize myself with the interface.
After an hour or so of getting to know Twitter properly, it would seem that the updates to it's functionality have definitely made it easier to use. It was at least 3 years since I tried using it, and I now found it far more easier to navigate, view and... absorb Information. My account now is setup very similar to my RSS feeds, with a mix of my personal interests and news. It was interesting to see many of the bigger sources using Vine, a subsidiary of Twitter, to post videos relating to their tweets.
I think I can safely say I will continue to actively use twitter, and as my follows-base increases, there will be more and more use. I can't find much to post about personally yet, however, so I'm more of a lurker than anything - and after viewing some of my friends feed, I'd happy leave my follows related to my interests, rather than seeing somewhat meaningless updates from my friends (yes, that's a nice burger, yes I know you're stuck in traffic).
From a business point of view, I can now understand why it's almost compulsory to have a Facebook AND Twitter page now - especially if you're business conducts interesting, rapid work.
My use of Twitter has also highlighted to me now why RSS is becoming outdated. While RSS feeds are able to keep a consistent, organised feed of content coming in - and it should be noted that do work differently - Twitter utilizes a very similar mechanic in a way that simply seems to work better. If it's worth talking about, people are more than likely going to tweet it, and this is able to be seen far more quickly than writing a post or article about it, and waiting for your RSS feed to find it.
Phew... that's a nice wall o text... But in summary, I found this week to really useful with getting me used to some new technologies. I think in the future I just need to spend some more time getting to know them before I jump the gun and make an uninformed desicion. While I will continue to use both of these technologies for the semester, I think ultimately, I will continue to use twitter afterwards.